Why to choose Laser cleaning?
Advantages of Laser Cleaning
Reduced Downtime
A machine can often be cleaned either in-situ as an integral part of the operation cycle or done in the maintenance tool room in a cleaning cell . Cleaning Downtime can be dramatically reduced or even eliminated when Laser Cleaning is employed.
No Waste & No CleanUp
Unlike traditional abrasive cleaning techniques there is no need to dispose of the removed material. There is very little residue and any residue that is created can be collected using a low suction extraction system, setup near the interaction zone of where the beam is doing the cleaning.
Improved Productivity
Very often the Laser Cleaning activity can be automated as part of your process and not only will this remove costly cleaning cycles with associated cycle time improvements , but an automated or motorised cleaning system has little or no labour costs.
No Consumables
Many traditional abrasive processes either require a large amount of costly consumables or special chambers to carry out the cleaning process. Laser Cleaning is completely self-contained and the only utility service required is electricity and maybe a supply of compressed air.
Completely Non Abrasive
Laser Cleaning is completely non-abrasive and is a powerful solution for applications where the maintenance of tight tolerances is required after the cleaning process has been completed. In general Laser Cleaning will remove only the contaminants on the substrate and once removed, the process self-terminates as no damage or surface imperfections on the metal surface will occur.
Limited PPE (Personal Protection Equipment)
Laser Cleaning requires little training to operate safely and the only PPE required is a standard laser safety glasses to protect the eyes. No ear protection or gloves are required while in operation.
ADVANTAGES OF LASER CLEANING COMPARED WITH TRADITIONAL CLEANING
100% Ecologic and economic Cleaning
| Comparison Item | Laser Clean | Chemical Clean | Dry Ice Clean | Mechanical Clean | Ultrasonic Clean | Sandblasting |
| Cleaning Method | By Laser, non-contact | Chemical reagent, contact material | Dry ice, non-contact | Mechanical Abrasive contact material | Cleaning agent, contact material | Special sand particles |
| Damage | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Cleaning Efficiency | High | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Consumables | Only electricity | Chemical reagent | Dry ice | Sandpaper, Grinding wheel, abrasive stone/etc. | Special cleaning fluid | Special sand particles |
| Cleaning Effect | Excellent, high cleanness | Ordinary, uneven | Good, but uneven | Ordinary, uneven | Good, but less cleanliness | Ordinary, uneven |
| Precision | Precise control, high precision | Not control, very low precision | Not control, very low precision | Not control, medium precision | Cannot specify a range to clean | Cannot specify a range to clean |
| Safety/Environmental protection | No any pollution | Seriously polluting environment | No pollution | Polluting environment | No pollution | Polluting environment |
Manual Operation | Easy operation, hand-held or automatic | Complicate operation, high requirements to workers, pollution protection measures needed. | Easy operation, hand-held or automatic | Expend labour, pollution protection measures needed | Easy operation, but need to add consumables manually | Expend labour, pollution protection measures needed |
Cost Input | Higher initial cost, no consumables, very low maintenance cost | Low initial cost, very high consumables cost | Medium initial cost, high consumables cost | High initial cost, high consumable and labor costs | Low initial cost, medium consumables cost | High initial cost, high consumable and labor costs |